ABSTRACT
Objetivo: estimar o impacto orçamentário incremental da terapia-alvo para tratamento de primeira linha do melanoma avançado não cirúrgico e metastático, em comparação à dacarbazina. Métodos: análise de impacto orçamentário na perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) do Brasil; a partir de dados demográficos e estimativas da incidência, foi delimitada a população no horizonte temporal de três anos (2018-2020) e estimados os custos diretos médicos; foi considerado cenário de referência o tratamento com dacarbazina, e como cenários alternativos a terapia-alvo com vemurafenibe, dabrafenibe, vemurafenibe + cobimetinibe e dabrafenibe + trametinibe; a avaliação das incertezas foi conduzida mediante análise por cenários. Resultados: o impacto orçamentário incremental variou de R$ 451.867.881,00 a R$ 768.860.968,00, representando 0,70 a 1,53% dos gastos anuais totais com medicamentos ambulatoriais no SUS; no melhor e no pior cenário, os resultados variaram de R$ 289.160.835,00 a R$ 1.107.081.926,00. Conclusão: a terapia-alvo, comparada à dacarbazina, implica impacto excessivo no orçamento, desfavorecendo eventual incorporação.
Objetivo: estimar el impacto presupuestario incremental de la terapia dirigida para tratamiento de primera línea del melanoma avanzado no quirúrgico y metastásico comparado con la dacarbazina. Métodos: análisis de impacto presupuestario, en la perspectiva del Sistema Único de Salud (SUS) de Brasil; a partir de datos demográficos y estimaciones de incidencia se delimitó la población en un horizonte temporal de tres años (2018-2020) y se estimaron los costos directos médicos. El escenario de referencia fue el tratamiento con dacarbazina y los escenarios alternativos la terapia dirigida con vemurafenib, dabrafenib, vemurafenib + cobimetinib y dabrafenib + trametinib; la evaluación de incertidumbre se llevó a cabo mediante análisis por escenarios. Resultados: el impacto presupuestario incremental varió de R$ 451.867.881,00 a R$ 768.860.968,00, representando 0,70 a 1,53% de gastos anuales totales con medicamentos de ambulatorios en el SUS; en el mejor y el peor escenario los resultados variaron de R$ 289.160.835,00 a R$ 1.107.081.926,00. Conclusión: el uso de terapia dirigida comparado a la dacarbazina implica en impacto excesivo en el presupuesto, desfavoreciendo una eventual incorporación.
Objective: to estimate the incremental budget impact of target therapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-surgical and metastatic melanoma compared to dacarbazine treatment. Methods: budget impact analysis, from the Brazilian National Health System (SUS) perspective; based on demographic data and incidence estimates, the population over a three-year time horizon (2018-2020) was delimited and the direct medical costs were estimated; the reference scenario was treatment with dacarbazine, and the alternative scenarios were target therapy with vemurafenib, dabrafenib, vemurafenib + cobimetinib and dabrafenib + trametinib; uncertainty assessment was conducted through scenario analysis. Results: the incremental budget impact ranged from R$ 451,867,881.00 to R$ 768,860,968.00, representing 0.70 to 1.53% of total SUS annual outpatient drugs expenditure; in best and worst scenario, results ranged from R$ 289,160,835.00 to R$ 1,107,081,926.00. Conclusion: the use of target therapy compared to dacarbazine implies an excessive impact on the budget, this bring unfovorable to its possible incorporation.
Subject(s)
Humans , Costs and Cost Analysis/trends , Dacarbazine/administration & dosage , Dacarbazine/therapeutic use , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Molecular Targeted Therapy/trends , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Unified Health System , Public Health/trends , Health Care Costs/trends , Neoplasm Metastasis/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/economicsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Recent advances in the understanding of tumor driver mutations, signaling pathways that lead to tumor progression, and the better understanding of the interaction between tumor cells and the immune system are revolutionizing cancer treatment. The pace at which new treatments are approved and the prices at which they are set have made it even more difficult to offer these treatments in countries like Brazil. In this review we present for the non-oncologist these new treatments and compare their availability in Brazilian public health system and private health system with that of developed countries.
RESUMO Avanços recentes na compreensão de mutações promotoras de desenvolvimento do câncer, sinalização que leva à progressão de tumores, e o avanço no entendimento da interação entre as células tumorais e o sistema imunológico estão revolucionando o tratamento do câncer. A velocidade com que novos tratamentos são aprovados e o alto custo das medicações dificultam a disponibilização de terapêuticas em países como o Brasil. Nesta revisão, apresentamos ao não oncologista esses novos tratamentos e comparamos sua disponibilidade nos sistemas público e privado de saúde no Brasil com os países desenvolvidos.
Subject(s)
Humans , Medical Oncology/trends , Neoplasms/therapy , Brazil , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Molecular Targeted Therapy/trends , Immunotherapy/trendsABSTRACT
Angiogenesis is a complex biological phenomenon that forms new blood vessels from the pre-existing vasculature. Aberrant angiogenesis has been implicated in a variety of diseases such as cancer, atherosclerosis, arthritis, obesity, pulmonary hypertension, diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration. These conditions collectively affect nearly 10% of the global population. Much effort has focused on identifying new therapeutic agents that inhibit pathological angiogenesis since 1971, when Judah Folkman published the hypothesis that tumor growth is angiogenesis-dependent and that its inhibition may be therapeutic. In 2004, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first antiangiogenic drug for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer, bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech). This drug is a humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes the vascular endothelial growth factor. It is used in combination with chemotherapy, and its use began the era of antiangiogenesis therapy. Several new therapeutic agents have been added to the list of approved drugs, and clinical trials of new therapeutic options and antiangiogenic agents are ongoing. This review describes the progress made in the first decade of antiangiogenesis therapy, and addresses both validated and possible targets for future drug development.